The cat’s out of the bag. The consumers have come to know what many marketers have known for years: Consumer information and behaviour is being tracked and analyzed.
It’s ALL true. There’s nothing to deny.
But instead of understanding application of this information for business, somehow business has been lumped into the same category as the NSA: a now vilified group that’s perceived as relentless in capturing user information (without regard to privacy rights) in the name of national security.
The People Have Spoken
They don’t trust the use of their information. Their consent or lack thereof is being undermined.
Recently, I wrote a post about how Big Data will Change Advertising Forever. In this post, as a marketer I was quite excited at the possibilities of being able to gain more context into the behaviour and conversations that people share online and apply it to the current ad targeting capabilities.
One of the users sharing my post posed it in this way:
I did request a meeting to get a a deeper viewpoint from Dave Cheevers. We have yet to connect. However, his statement dawned on me just how in-the-dark the average consumer has been about the use of their information.
Edward Snowden, in many ways, has opened up a Pandora’s box bringing into public scrutiny what has been in play for many years. But what’s he’s also done is woken up the average consumer and has forced them to understand the impact on their security and personal rights and freedoms.
A Database Marketer’s Dream
As a database marketer, I was already purchasing lists and managing customer transaction records for clients.
I come from banking and loyalty management so understanding customer predisposition to brands, their buying patterns, their customer service scores, and their purchase frequency was integral in helping us determine the right offers and messaging initiatives to drive response.
Direct marketing practices were strict. We followed this to the letter: As a customer we could communicate to you and provide to you relevant offers and messages.
However, you could opt-out of communication at any time. The information you provided to us was tied to your transaction history. It allowed us to make sure we were only providing to you ONLY the offers that you would most likely respond to.
Remember Permission Marketing?
When the Internet became more fashionable in the 90’s businesses were devouring information about how marketing would migrate its way into this new connected medium.
Seth Godin stepped up and attempted to create the groundwork for making this happen. On his blog he states:
Permission marketing is the privilege (not the right) of delivering anticipated, personal and relevant messages to people who actually want to get them. It recognizes the new power of the best consumers to ignore marketing. It realizes that treating people with respect is the best way to earn their attention.
An important note here that Direct Marketers abide by: Treat the customer like gold. Abide by their wishes. Be transparent about the use of their information. Ensure they can opt-out at any time.
Permission is like dating. You don’t start by asking for the sale at first impression. You earn the right, over time, bit by bit.
So Marketers and consumers were able to come to acceptable terms about how the relationship was being managed. Now, consumers are demanding a whole new set of rules regarding transparency about the specific collection of information, its use, and inclusion of consumer consent.
How is the Internet Coping?
Has the consumer lost faith? If anything, it’s nice to see the Internet has not lost its humour. Check out these #NSAPickupLines from ReadWriteWeb:
Consumers are ALSO Accountable.
The blame isn’t one-sided. Consumers are increasingly aware of how much and to what extent their information is being aggregated on social networks, when they shop, when they bank online etc.
Emarketer conducted a survey recently among US smartphone users.
….the vast majority of respondents—76%—believed they [as individuals] held the most responsibility for managing their own privacy protections.
The table below reveals the instances where consumers are most concerned about their privacy.
According to EMarketer:
Mobile app users are least guarded about sharing their gender information with a company—53% of respondents said they would acquiesce to such a request. Next in line was age (44%), an email address (39%) and a full name (31%). There was a sharp dropoff in the willingness of consumers to provide an app with their birthdate. And nearly a quarter of respondents said they didn’t want to share any information at all.
It seems there is an increasing reluctance to provide personal information. Consumers, understandably, are more guarded about what they disclose.
Have We Lost Faith from the Consumer?
Consumers want more authenticity. Consumers also want more control.
I wrote a similar post which provided a viewpoint as a parent: Teaching Our Kids Not to Treat the Internet as a Private Diary. Here I described the importance of teaching our kids to be more discreet about what they share.
Ironically, as a parent, I came to the realization how damaging effects that “too much information” could wreak havoc on individuals down the road.
The parent and marketer sides of me say this:
I am a marketer and these rich profiles are what we, as marketers, crave. We want to know more about you so we can connect with you and sell you stuff. And we are willing to pay Facebook more if the information we get in return makes it easier to sell our products.
I am a mother as well so I see both sides of the coin. Big data is a huge topic these days. Everyone talks about its merits and the amount of insight we can glean from the billions of actions and post on social networks, mobile devices on a daily basis. While it has it merits there has to be controls. We need to ask the question, “Why do you need to know this?”
Facebook Seems to be Moving Backwards
Despite the fact that Facebook maintains this revision merely clarifies existing policies, not alters it, the FTC is concerned and is now looking into the new policy to determine if it has violated the provisions set out in the 2011 agreement.
Senator Edward Markey, Democrat of Massachussetts took the stand against Facebook declaring:
Are Consumers Ready for Absolute Transparency?
I found this article astounding, Will Transparency Help Big Data Face Down Its Critics?
It provides an initiative by Axiom.com that allows consumers enter their name, address and social security information in order to access a portal that reveals any and all information collected about them. But this is not one-sided.
While it allows the user to opt-out of having their data used, the site also seeks to educate the consumer about the “merits of data improving people’s lives”. I encourage you to go to AboutTheData.com.
As the homepage explains:
“We no longer want to receive mass marketing — getting bombarded with ads that have no relevancy to our lives — because it’s intrusive and wastes our time. That’s why companies want to use data about you to personalize and shape your experiences with them.”
This is a definite step-forward for the consumer and provides them with some level of control that was not open to them before. But more companies have to come forward and trust that negotiated terms with the consumer will allow both parties into a win/win relationship. That’s going to take time.
In the meantime, it is a two way street.
Marketers Must Also Be Responsible
Julie Bernard, the Macy’s senior VP-customer strategy, spoke at a digital conference and told attendees:
“The media has spun this story so negative, and it’s really a shame that people in our positions have not taken a more dominant position on speaking on the macro and micro economic benefits of delivering relevancy by responsibly using customer data”
Consumers still need to be educated on the value,
“There’s a funny consumer thing ,” [says Bernard]. “They’re worried about our use of data, but they’re pissed if I don’t deliver relevance. … How am I supposed to deliver relevance and magically deliver what they want if I don’t look at the data?”
It also stands to reason that we, as marketers, must also show restraint what we collect and how we use the information. We have the means to track so much data on users to benefit the company’s goals… but it doesn’t mean we should.
Today, company’s reputation has come under increased scrutiny. Companies are more vulnerable than ever to the whims of the angry customer voices, and are aware they are held to much higher standards today.
The Quid Pro Quo
In my opinion, the more consumers are educated about the information that’s collected about them, the more they will be inclined to share information that will further improve their customer experience. They will also be more discerning and think twice about the content they post.
As marketers the value of this information is to 1) Provide ONLY relevant messages to my customers that keeps them loyal 2) Provide customers with an experience that’s second to none.
If the information is not relevant to those specific goals then we should not be collecting it. Period.
Image: Z Communications
Founder at ArCompany, and Director, International Council on Global Privacy and Security by Design Hessie is a seasoned digital strategist, and intelligence analyst having held senior positions for top ad agencies including Ogilvy, Rapp Collins, ONE and Isobar Digital. She also has extensive start-up experience in AI technologies, social tech, online publishing and artificial intelligence like Yahoo! Answers, Overlay.TV, Jugnoo and Cerebri AI. Hessie is the co-author of EVOLVE: Marketing (as we know it) is Doomed! She is also an active writer for Forbes, Cognitive World, Towards Data Science and Marketing Insider Group.